Face Shields Proper Utilization
PPE Focus: Face Shields
Personal protective equipment (PPE) is an aspect of safety where people tend to make many errors, and for quite a lot of reasons. Usually, we think that the mere wearing of PPE makes us proof against injury. With as much emphasis as we place on eye protection and head protection, do we lose sight (no pun intended) of protecting our faces? Definitely, eye protection is vital, since eye injuries can lead to everlasting blindness. Equally essential is head protection, stopping deadly head injuries the most effective that we can. Face injuries might not appear as significant a priority. They don't have the rapid, everlasting, and potentially deadly consequences of the others. With that said, although, an employer’s accountability is to protect all elements of their staff, including their faces.
That duty includes identifying tasks the place face shields needs to be used, providing face shields for workers to use, training them to make use of face shields appropriately, and to right workers when face shields are used incorrectly or not used at all. The first elements are easy. Our employees will make mistakes. Correcting these errors and imposing your company’s face shield requirements is an essential a part of an efficient PPE program. Sadly, too usually, this side of the PPE program is not enforced until after an worker is injured.
Conditions to Use Face Shields
Consider the next conditions the place face shields should have been used, and the implications for the injured workers and their employers.
An worker was filling ammonia nurse tanks from a bulk plant. The employee was distracted while closing the valves, and mistakenly turned the mistaken valve, causing a pressure launch in the line. The discharge of anhydrous ammonia splashed on the worker’s face. The worker was hospitalized for chemical burns on and across the face.
An worker was putting in a water pipe at a multifamily residential building project. The worker initially was working an excavator, then climbed down from the excavator to cut a ten-inch water pipe with a reduce-off saw. The noticed kicked back and struck the worker’s face. Co-workers called emergency providers, who transported the worker to the hospital. The employee was admitted to the hospital and handled for facial lacerations that prolonged from underneath the left eye to underneath the jaw.
In the first state of affairs, the employee suffered critical chemical burns. A face shield would have significantly reduced the chemical publicity, the extent of the chemical burns, and probably may have prevented any ammonia from splashing on the worker’s face. Sure, the worker turned the mistaken valve, but does that imply that the employer is absolved of all duty for this incident? Of course not. The very fact stays that the employer ought to provide staff filling ammonia nurse tanks with face shields, train staff to use the face shields accurately, and require them to make use of them when performing this task. Then they must regularly and persistently enforce the face shield requirements. Doing so would have provided additional protection to the worker, even from the effects of the worker’s own actions.