Face Shields Proper Usage
PPE Focus: Face Shields
Personal protective equipment (PPE) is a facet of safety the place individuals are inclined to make many mistakes, and for a variety of reasons. Usually, we think that the mere wearing of PPE makes us proof against injury. With as much emphasis as we place on eye protection and head protection, can we lose sight (no pun supposed) of protecting our faces? Certainly, eye protection is vital, since eye injuries can lead to everlasting blindness. Equally important is head protection, preventing fatal head accidents the best that we can. Face accidents might not seem as significant a priority. They don't have the speedy, everlasting, and probably fatal consequences of the others. With that said, though, an employer’s responsibility is to protect all parts of their staff, including their faces.
That accountability contains figuring out tasks where face shields should be used, providing face shields for employees to use, training them to make use of face shields correctly, and to right workers when face shields are used incorrectly or not used at all. The primary parts are easy. Our staff will make mistakes. Correcting these mistakes and enforcing your organization’s face shield necessities is an essential a part of an effective PPE program. Sadly, too usually, this facet of the PPE program just isn't enforced till after an worker is injured.
Conditions to Use Face Shields
Consider the following conditions where face shields should have been used, and the consequences for the injured workers and their employers.
An worker was filling ammonia nurse tanks from a bulk plant. The employee was distracted while closing the valves, and mistakenly turned the unsuitable valve, causing a pressure release within the line. The discharge of anhydrous ammonia splashed on the worker’s face. The worker was hospitalized for chemical burns on and around the face.
An worker was putting in a water pipe at a multifamily residential building project. The worker initially was operating an excavator, then climbed down from the excavator to cut a ten-inch water pipe with a minimize-off saw. The noticed kicked back and struck the worker’s face. Co-workers called emergency services, who transported the employee to the hospital. The employee was admitted to the hospital and handled for facial lacerations that prolonged from underneath the left eye to underneath the jaw.
In the first state of affairs, the employee suffered critical chemical burns. A face shield would have significantly reduced the chemical publicity, the extent of the chemical burns, and possibly could have prevented any ammonia from splashing on the employee’s face. Yes, the employee turned the fallacious valve, however does that imply that the employer is absolved of all accountability for this incident? Of course not. The very fact remains that the employer should provide employees filling ammonia nurse tanks with face shields, train staff to make use of the face shields accurately, and require them to make use of them when performing this task. Then they must continually and constantly enforce the face shield requirements. Doing so would have provided additional protection to the worker, even from the effects of the worker’s own actions.